This project has been flagged by a community member as inappropriate due to reason below.*

Expert Interview

Slingshot members are talking to an expert! The topic is:

Overview of Migraine therapies - Biohaven - 2nd look

Ticker(s): BHVN, ABBV

Who's the expert?

Institution: Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

  • Clinical Neurologist. Director of the Dartmouth Headache Center, and Professor of Neurology at Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth.
  • Treats~150 migraine patients per month.
  • Previously investigator in the rimegepant Phase 2 trial when it was owned by BMS. and has published over 330 peer-reviewed manuscripts, editorials, and books.

Interview Questions
Q1.

Are you familiar with their intranasal CGRP, I think it's called zavegepant? Besides efficacy, what do you think would be the key considerations for an intranasal CGRP wrt market adoption?

Added By: wilson_admin
Q2.

So the CGRP space is dominated by big Pharma, but BioHaven has managed to do quite well versus the much bigger competition. Do you have any big theories as to why that is? Maybe analgesic rebound?

Added By: wilson_admin
Q3.

Of your patients currently on Nurtec, what percentage do you think are taking it in an abortive context vs a preventative one?

Added By: wilson_admin
Q4.

It seems like Ubrelvy has more dosing flexibility, where you can redone if the first dose doesn't abort the migraine, but patients might like the ODT formulation of Nurtec, maybe increased tolerability for patients with severe nausea or vomiting. Do you or your patients have a preference for Ubrelvy or Nurtec? Are there any other key differences between the two which are significant for patients?

Added By: wilson_admin
Q5.

Looking at Vyepti, the IV CGRP, it seems to have similar efficacy as the SC agents. Is it fair to say that this isn't a very popular choice due to the downsides of logistics and convenience?

Added By: wilson_admin
Q6.

The data from Nurtec on the preventative indication doesn't seem very strong. Of your patients who are taking Nurtec for preventative use, how many would you estimate report no significant change in monthly migraines?

Added By: wilson_admin
Q7.

Have you prescribed Qulipta yet? For people on preventative CGRPs, how many would you say are using any injectable CGRPs vs Nurtec ODT or Qulipta?

Added By: wilson_admin
Q8.

for your patients currently on injectable CGRPs, how many would you say are episodic vs chronic?

Added By: wilson_admin
Q9.

Looking at the preventative SC CGRP agents, do you have a preference? Emgality doesn't have dosing flexibility, but is also indicated for cluster headache. Aimovig has two different monthly doses and Ajovy has monthly and quarterly dosing flexibility. Do those play into your decisions at all? Do you find these differences particularly meaningful for patients?

Added By: wilson_admin
Q10.

How has your experience with insurance coverage with CGRPs been? Have you noticed any significant differences in coverage between the SC and oral agents?

Added By: wilson_admin
Q11.

For patients who take Nurtec ODT,  how common do you think it is that patients are taking Nurtec for both abortive and preventative use? Or is it more likely patients taking medications for both abortive and preventative use would take different classes of drugs respectively?

Added By: wilson_admin
Q12.

Is it generally fair to say that patients with episodic migraine are more likely to just use abortive agents, where as chronic migraine patients are more likely to use both preventative and abortive agents?

Added By: wilson_admin
Q13.

Can you discuss what the current treatment paradigm might look like nowadays for abortive agents? Is it mostly over the counter NSAIDs, triptans, then CGRPs? Where does botox and DHE fit in there?

Added By: wilson_admin
Q14.

The patients that you see, are they mostly referrals? And of your patients, what percentage would you say are chronic vs episodic?

Added By: wilson_admin
Q15.

Can you discuss your clinical practice and research focus?

Added By: wilson_admin

Do you want answers to these questions?

Slingshot Insights Explained

Expert research benefits investors by giving them timely access to unbiased real world perspectives on highly specialized topics. Slingshot Insights' crowdfunded model makes this access available at a fraction of the cost of other expert networks.

Reason

*Slingshot Insights provides access to information, not investment advice. We work to support you and facilitate access to experts; however we are not responsible for monitoring calls for the disclosure of MNPI. You should obtain financial, legal and tax advice from your qualified and licensed advisers before deciding to invest in any security.